OER as a Moral Imperative in a Time of Constraint and Censorship by Caterina Belle Azzarello, PhD Candidate, Educational Psychology

Let me start with a simple but powerful idea: Open Educational Resources (OER) aren’t just useful or innovative—they’re a moral imperative. A moral imperative is when something feels so right or important that you have to do it, even if no one is making you. We’re living in a time of undeniable challenge in higher education. Across the country, universities and colleges are cutting budgets, laying off personnel, increasing costs for students and increasing workloads for staff and faculty. Programs and clubs that once served as lifelines for first-generation and marginalized students are disappearing.

Higher Education in Crisis

It’s not just about budgets. Academic freedom is being dismantled piece by piece. In Florida and Texas, for instance, new laws restrict teaching African American studies, gender theory, and even basic discussions of race and identity. Entire histories and scientific realities, like climate change or reproductive health, are being stripped from classrooms. Not because they’re inaccurate, but because they’re politically disruptive. Some of this happens quietly, through defunding. Some of this is loud, deliberate, and aggressive. Either way, if we don’t name it, challenge it, and offer alternatives, the effects will last long after today’s students have graduated.

Meanwhile, textbook costs remain a crushing barrier. Students skip meals, work multiple jobs, or go without required materials altogether. For some, the choice is literally between groceries and learning. A few years ago, one UNC student shared this: “I know students who failed because they couldn’t afford the textbook...it has caused me to stress greatly, and I had to choose between getting food or getting the textbook.” We’ve often heard that with great challenges come great opportunities, and that’s where OER enter the conversation, not as a trend, but as a lifeline. Sure, OER help reduce costs. But they’re so much more than that.

OER as a Lifeline, Not a Trend

OER restore agency to educators. They remove barriers for learners. They give teachers the freedom to choose resources that are pedagogically sound, factually accurate, and ethically right—not just what a publisher sells or what an administration approves of.

As someone who works in education research, I’ve seen how much trust matters: trust between students and teachers, trust in the materials we use, trust in the systems that are supposed to uphold knowledge, not suppress it.

When a teacher can’t afford to assign a textbook or is told they can’t use a resource because it clashes with a political narrative, or even when a student doesn’t see themselves reflected in their curriculum, that’s not just unfortunate. That’s unjust.

OER give us a way forward. They let educators adapt content to their classrooms and their communities. They allow us to include marginalized voices and tell the full story. And they guarantee that students—no matter their zip code, background, skin color, or bank account—can access the tools they need to succeed. That’s why universities have a moral obligation to support OER. Not as an afterthought, but as core infrastructure. 

That means investing in faculty training, incentivizing OER creation and adoption, and weaving open practices into policy. That’s why I’m proud to be a member of the AOER Committee at the University of Northern Colorado and deeply grateful for the support of the state of Colorado and the Colorado Department of Higher Education, whose grant funding makes so much of this work possible at UNC and around the state.

It also means defending academic freedom, especially now. Because when facts are politicized and evidence is treated as optional, open education becomes one of our strongest defenses. By making knowledge accessible, transparent, and verifiable, we uphold the integrity of scholarship and empower both educators and students to think critically, challenge misinformation, and protect the pursuit of truth. 

A Commitment to Truth, Equity, and Access

At the end of the day, we’re not just educators. We’re stewards of truth, equity, and possibility. OER are more than resources — they’re a moral commitment. A commitment to: openness over obscurity. Inclusion over exclusion. Facts over fear.

And in times like these, the commitment to OER and affordability is not only important, but also a moral responsibility we carry as educators and learners. Choosing openness and access is our resistance to barriers that limit opportunity, and it is our path forward toward a more just and inclusive future.