Diana Becker was awarded an OER grant in the 2023-24 academic year. In this profile, she discusses why and how she is using OER in her NURS 374 Clinical: Adult Health course.
What course did you convert to OER?
I converted NURS 374, which is a course where nursing students learn at the beginning of the semester how to care for adult patients in the hospital setting. They then put these principles into practice during a 10-week rotation working alongside nurses in the hospital.
What open resource(s) did you use?
I used two sources primarily: Nursing Advanced Skills by Open RN and Nursing Skills, 2e by Chippewa Valley Technical College.
What motivated you to convert your course to OER?
When I attended college a number of years ago, I remember the cost associated with textbooks. I also remember that some of those books were not used for more than a chapter or two. I began to look at alternatives to traditional textbooks after a colleague discussed it at a faculty meeting.
Could you describe the process you went through to convert your course to OER?
Prior to conversion, I had a pretty good idea of what I was looking for. Additionally, I had already done some research into what resources I may want to use. Since the resources I was looking for primarily pertained to skill attainment, it was easy to find the style of book that I wanted. I also knew that I didn’t just want to change to an online book. I wanted to create a resource that presented material that students needed to know, rather than having to find the pages or sections I wanted the students to read. Once I found the resources I wanted, I read through each section and created separate documents: must read, good review, and checklists. During the fall semester, I created a resource using the desired material for what the students must read. Moving forward, I hope to also create a resource with the review materials and checklists.
Did you encounter any challenges during the conversion process, and if so, how did you overcome them?
The main challenge I have faced is working with colleagues about the advantages to OER materials. We are still working through this! Otherwise, I was fortunate to easily find materials I wanted to use.
Have you received any feedback from students about using OER in your course? If so, what has been their response?
I sent out a 7-question survey to students. I didn’t receive a lot of feedback, but those who did respond found the materials accessible and easy to read. However, many of them didn’t read all of the materials. But, those who didn’t read all materials did self-report that they often don’t read materials for courses.
Can you share any advice or tips for other faculty members who are considering converting their courses to OER?
If you are considering using OER, do it. If you just keep thinking about it, you will never do it. I think it is well worth the faculty time because it truly enables you to create a resource that is specific to your course, without all of the extra information or materials that may be in a traditional textbook.
What courses did you convert to OER?
I converted to OER two of the large introductory, LAC [Liberal Arts Curriculum] astronomy courses: AST 109: The Cosmos and AST 101: Stars and Galaxies. AST 109 – currently delivered online, asynchronously - is a class very popular with UNC students across all fields of study, from freshmen to seniors. It offers a broad overview of all of astronomy, from the night sky to cosmology. AST 101 is an in-person introductory course with evening observational labs, more narrowly focused on the evolution of stars and galaxies in the universe.
What open resources did you use in your converted course?
The main change for both courses has been in replacing the commercial textbook with the open access one from OpenStax.org Astronomy 2e by Fraknoi, Morrison and Wolf.
What motivated you to convert your courses?
In short, I wanted to provide immediate and free access to a good textbook. The constantly increasing cost of the textbook I used to require for the courses was placing an undue burden on our students. Plus, students on financial aid always received their textbook funds weeks into the semester, and delayed textbook access adversely affects learning. AST 101 has a large enrollment of 60-70 students every semester. AST 109 is even larger, serving up to 200 students, and given I teach one section of it every Fall, Spring and Summer semesters, I am able to reach up to 1600 undergraduate students over 4 years – a quarter of the UNC undergrads.
Could you describe the process you went through to convert your courses to OER?
Initially, my goal was to convert AST 109 to a low-cost course, not to an OER. I planned to change the commercial textbook to the open access OpenStax one and to replace the commercial online homework resource MasteringAstronomy with a lower cost one from WebAssign. But during my efforts to negotiate a cost below $20 per student per semester with the publisher, I was told that the pricing on their website is outdated, and students would have to pay twice as much. While they were willing to provide the site access at a reduced cost for a year, the price was going to increase afterwards. I am tired of seeing predatory publishers constantly and unjustifiably increase prices – and I wanted to shield my students from that. So I spend much of the summer building my own homework sets on Canvas and in the Fall offering what AST 109 as an OER course, with a free textbook and Canvas homework.
Did you encounter any challenges during the conversion process, and if so, how did you overcome them?
Changing the textbook was seamless. OpenStax provide easy LMS integration with Canvas. My challenge now is to continue to improve the homework sets. The initial one was ok, but the previous homework resource included video tutorial and interactive problems, which are impossible to build in Canvas. Canvas has limitation in how students can demonstrate their knowledge, which has been a bit frustrating.
Have you received any feedback from students about using OER in your course? If so, what has been their response?
On the first day of class in AST 101, in its first offering as an OER, there was a very noticeable sigh of relief when students learned that we will be using OER materials, and that they will not have to pay for a textbook. Previously, with the paid textbook, many students would not access to the textbook and homework for weeks into the semester, which prevented them from completing the graded discissions and put them behind. Now that barrier is not there since the textbook is available to them on day 1.
I compared student test scores between my previous and the new OER offerings of AST 109 and AST 101 and discovered that learning improved by an average of 9% and 8 % in those classes, respectively.
Can you share any advice or tips for other faculty members who are considering converting their courses to OER?
I was reluctant to even try to convert a course to OER. The low-stakes, small exploration OER grant helped me get started thinking of possibilities, without obligations to pursue the change – which was key for me. I believe I might have even inspired some colleagues in the Department to convert their astronomy courses, as I was becoming quite excited about the change and the benefit it would have for students. I discovered there are many resources available which made the work easier than I expected.
Commenting on blog posts requires an account.
Login is required to interact with this comment. Please and try again.
If you do not have an account, Register Now.